It seems that nowadays we are living in an ever-changing society. A society where the definition of words change even though the words have not. Freedom to do whatever one wants seems to be the theme. Sometimes such aspirations can begin to take on a whole new meaning in itself. Dr. Frankenstein created a monster out of his desire to preserve life. Ironically, his creation took his life. What direction is humanity going with all of the new ways that people attempt to define themselves? Some will say humanity is going to hell, or that humanity is already there.
One of the sickest things that I have seen in my short time on this rock is the creation and the implementation of the non-gender specific bathrooms in schools. Totally insane concept. All patents should be up in arms, or anyone for that matter, when considering that their children will be forced to use restrooms that are also shared by the opposite sex. It sounds strange even saying “opposite sex” these days. These people with this gender swamp agenda are doing social engineering. They are programming our children the idea that the creator was wrong and separate genders do not exist.
There are some things that are helping to cause these ambiguous changes. Animals are coming up in studies where when exposed to high levels of estrogen, nearly all of the test subjects sex changes. Also, we have a lot of food that has soy as an ingredient. Read your the ingredients in your food. Nearly all processed food that we eat has soy in it. Soy is very high in estrogen. Estrogen is a female sex hormone produced from ovarian follicles in female mammals. According to some scientific tests, fish populations can be effected dramatically causing male fish to produce eggs and change their sex from male to female. We have been seeing an influx of homosexuality, lesbianism, and transsexuality over the last few decades. Industrial companies pollute the water with their chemical by-products which oftentimes is high in estrogen. Along with all of the soy in our food, maybe this could be a catalyst for all of the sexual confusion that we have been experiencing. Maybe there is an agenda being forced upon the general public here in America and abroad to confuse the sexes. But why?
Unless you are blind, it is easy to see that homosexuality and transgenderism are being forced upon us. We don’t know whether to call someone a male or female. And if we get it wrong, all hell breaks loose. It’s to the point where transexuals and transvestites are being allowed to give book readings in drag in libraries across America. Not only that, but schools are allowing books on homosexuality and such to be part of the curriculum for children in kindergarten. The fact is that we are being socially and genetically modified to accept the homosexuality and transgender agenda. There is an agenda. Look up NAMBLA for further information. Not only are they forcing homosexuality and transgenderism on us but also pedophilia as well. One can witness this conspiracy or agenda when taking a look at male musicians and entertainers wearing dresses (even if for a movie because this runs amuck in Hollywood), purses, and the color pink. This agenda is a part of the transhumanist movement which is the portal to population reduction.
Today we live in a world where we are made to believe that up is down and down is up. Where gender doesn’t exist or it exists in a multitude of categories beyond male and female. Where children prior to pubescence are telling their parents what they identify with sexually. Where power is being taken from the parents subjecting the parents to be governed by their Children of the Corn.
It seems almost impossible to imagine. With a starting lineup of some 28 candidates, the race seems to now be a competition between the six who made the stage in the Las Vegas debate – with no disrespect to those who are officially still running but not able to make it to the debate stage. As Joe Biden oft says – “come on, people, get real.”
Looking at the mud fight that was billed as the Democrats’ Las Vegas debate, it is arguable that the best choices are no longer in the running.
The progressive wing of the Democratic Party might have been better served by candidates like New Jersey Senator Cory Booker or California Senator Kamala Harris. They lean to the left ALMOST as far as Senator Elizabeth Warren but without falling into the radical camp of senator Bernie Sanders. They are certainly as articulate as any of those in the lead – and more so that some of them.
Like their policies or not, they do have strong resumes – especially Booker who was the mayor of a MAJOR city (Sorry, Mayor Pete) and a United States Senator. He came to the race with stronger credentials than Barack Obama – and he made it all the way to the White House. Given the Democrats current flirtation with dogmatic socialism, Booker and Harris are more moderate, ergo more acceptable and more likely to win.
In terms of the so-called moderate wing of the Democratic Party, the best candidates fell off the earliest. In fact, they hardly got any traction whatsoever. Guys like Colorado Senator Michael Bennett. I saw him as the John Kasich of the Democrat field. You remember Kasich – the former governor of Ohio and candidate calling for harmony, unity and all things wonderful. Kasich was a bit of a whiner and that is the same quality I see in Bennett. In terms of projecting a public image, Kasich and Bennett are two guys you could not find if they were standing on a street corner by themselves.
Another moderate who seemed like he would be a good President was Congressman John Delaney. But he had two problems. True political moderates are persona non grata in the Democratic Party and he is not a good campaigner.
It is not small irony that those who drop by the wayside in the race to the Oval Office seem to personify the call for unity – like they actually meant it and could do it. Of course, the frontrunners all claim that they can unify the nation, but they campaign on divisiveness.
Some of the Democrats who dropped out of the race could easily pass the likability test – something the frontrunners seem incapable of doing.
As a conservative, however, I am not sorry to see the disarray on the progressive Democrat side. They may be on their way to nominating the worst possible candidate.
So, there ‘tis.
Robots have always been of huge interest to me as a child. Who wouldn’t want his or her own personal mechanical servant that doesn’t need food or rest, doesn’t talk back and follows your instructions. All it needs is a battery or rechargeable solar cells, replacement parts and oil. Kind of like a car which we all find useful. This is the age that we are in now. The robotic age. The age of artificial intelligence. We would hate to be enslaved by our own creation, however. Movies like iRobot express this idea precisely. The tail wagging the dog is a common theme in Hollywood film so one has to wonder is Artificial Intelligence or A.I. safe?
Artificial Intelligence can be a direct bridge to transhumanism. Some might feel that being a bionic man like Lee Majors in The Six Million Dollar Man is the way to go. We went from a simple remote control for our TV to Siri or Alexa controlling just about any electrical device that the new technology can interface and communicate with. This may well be a natural unnatural progression for an intelligent species like us but at what cost. Some believe that the human race was on Mars prior to populating the earth. Their technology levels were a bit more advanced than ours where they used A.I. to do most things giving the people more time for things like war. This is said to be how Mars became inhabitable because of the destruction of the atmosphere from wars with weapons of mass destruction. In Greek mythology, Mars is the god of war.
Our current technology, most of which is not mainstream, has created microchips that can be implanted into the brain. These chips can enhance our perceptions and knowledge or be used to correct some form of neurological issue like a broken back. These chips are created via nanotechnology. Scientists at the University of Vermont have created the worlds first living robot. Joshua Bongard says that this creation is neither a traditional robot or a new species of animal but a living programmable organism. These robots are only 1 millimeter wide. The Deep Green Supercomputer is how this biological robot was created. They call these biological robots Xenobots. These xenobots can heal themselves like the terminator in the second Arnold Swartzennegger movie Terminator 2.
DARPA stands for the Defensive Advanced Research Projects Agency. This agency does a lot of covert development and testing. Currently, they are testing a development called SyNAPSE or systems of neuromorphic adaptive electronics. If you are unaware, a synapse is a component in our brains responsible for information transmission between neurons. In a nutshell. This SyNAPSE technology is nanobots that intercept the signal between neurons. So, basically these bots can be implanted in a person’s brain and control them like a remote control. This can be scary and the technology is here.
The truth of the matter is that technology can be used for good or bad. We have magic and we also have black magic. The same technology that created the microwave oven also created microwave weapons which in fact preceded the microwave oven. Most of, if not all, the technology that we currently get was created by the military for military use which usually is not so humane but gets the job done.
Conservative talk show host, and recent Medal of Freedom winner, Rush Limbaugh says he knows the truth about what is behind the coronavirus outbreak.
On a recent broadcast, Rush said that the coronavirus is nothing more than a “common cold” blown out of proportion by the media to take down President Donald Trump.
“It looks like the coronavirus is being weaponized as yet another element to bring down Donald Trump,” Rush said. “I want to tell you the truth about the coronavirus…. the coronavirus is the common cold, folks,” he added.
Rush then went on to say, “The drive-by media hype of this thing as a pandemic, as the Andromeda strain, as, ‘Oh, my God. If you get it, you’re dead…’ I think the survival rate is 98%,” he said. “Ninety-eight percent of people who get the coronavirus survive. It’s a respiratory system virus.”
Continuing, he added, “It probably is a ChiCom laboratory experiment that is in the process of being weaponized.”
Limbaugh then went on to claim that “all superpower nations weaponize bioweapons,” and the Russians “have weaponized fentanyl,” which is “also not what it is represented to be.”
“I’m not trying to get you to let your guard down. Nobody wants to get any of this stuff. I mean, you never… I hate getting the common cold. You don’t want to get the flu. It’s miserable,” Limbaugh declared. “But we’re not talking about something here that’s gonna wipe out your town or your city if it finds its way there.”
He concluded his diatribe about the virus with a deliberate jab at democratic-socialist Bernie Sanders.
“It came from a country that Bernie Sanders wants to turn the United States into a mirror image of: Communist China. That’s where it came from. It didn’t come from an American lab. It didn’t escape from an American research lab. It hasn’t been spread by Americans,” Limbaugh concluded. “It starts out in a communist country. Its tentacles spread all across the world in numbers that are not big and not huge, but they’re being reported as just the opposite. Just trying to keep it all in perspective.”
There are plenty of extremely powerful organizations that exist in the mainstream but are hidden by the cloak of secrecy. These organizations have websites where they publish their plans for the world and for the United States but these plans are never televised or expressed in the media. Every now and again something gets out but it easily is swept away safely under the proverbial rug. Unfortunately, the average person only hears about the outcome of a mission as it affects them individually. One such organization that runs America is the CFR.
Yes, there are agencies and organizations that are not part of government but controls government overall. The CFR would fall under the heading that one would call a Front Group. Front Groups penetrate into major industries, public and government offices, media, politics, education, the banking system, etc. Their overall job is to infiltrate common society on all levels. The Royal Institute for International Affairs was the name of these front groups which began in the 1920s. The name was later changed in the United States to the Council on Foreign Affairs.
The CFR had such members as W.A. Harriman and John D. Rockefeller (both members of the Skull and Bones), J.P. Morgan and Paul Warburg just to name a few. They play a major role in the take over of America’s sovereignty via the proposed New World Order because it creates the agenda for the Committee of 300. Many believe that the CFR is the government behind the U.S. government. There are videos of Hillary Clinton speaking at the CFR and stating clearly that our government gets marching orders from them.
There about four thousand members of the CFR in the United States. These people are in control of the biggest ost power an influential industries and mediums in the U.S. People like Alan Greenspan who was head of the Federal Reserve and George Soros. Some American presidents were and still are members of the CFR like Jimmy Carter, Gerald Ford, Bill Clinton, and Richard Nixon. This is important because the CFR is all about a new world order which means the destruction of the U.S. as a sovereign nation.
In July 1973, the Trilateral Commission was created. David Rockefeller was a chairman of the CFR around this time. The Trilateral Commission is a spin-off of the CFR which arose from the Bilderburg Group due to internal conflict concerning including Japan. Meetings of the Trilateral Commission were attended in private by CEOs of big companies, political officials, university presidents, labor union leaders, so on and so forth. This commission is basically an international CFR. After WWI, we had the League of Nations whose mission was to promote international corporations and security. It was established in 1949 under the Treaty of Versailles. Since the League of Nations could not prevent the 2nd World War, it was disbanded. The bottom line is that the Trilateral Commission’s goal is to set up the taking over of governments and economies via multinational banks and corporations.
Freedom is what this country was created upon. Unfortunately, the powers that be have their own definition of what they would call freedom for the common man. It only takes one bad apple to spoil the bunch. America is full of good people. It is to be the land of the free. Let us not let anyone or anything change that.
A lot of experts feel that fear is a great way to control the masses. One can see the logic in that when some thought is put on it. There is quite a bit of information out there that would easily support this claim. Many laws are passed that take away a person individuals liberties all for the sake of feeling safe. There are many means of control. One of these major ways to control a group of people could well be a deadly disease or virus.
Certain actions, though not similar, can bring about the same or similar reaction in people as a whole. Terror has been used, real or fake, to create a sense of fear and urgency as well as uncertainty in order to push an agenda whether it be war or martial law. Over the last few decades, we have been hit with a handful of new pathogens or viruses that cause the average person a lot of stress and fear of one’s own life. We had sars, bird flu, swine flu, ebola and now we have to face the coronavirus.
Three months ago, there was a simulation of a coronavirus outbreak. A staged pandemic drill. It’s not so bad that they had a drill, it’s just the timing of that is suspicious. This event was carried out by the World Economic Forum. Yet another organization that most humans haven’t even heard of but powerful world leaders and leaders of industry and entertainment congress and make plans on things and issues which concern everybody all without including the average citizen. John Hopkins University and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation were in attendance. It was called Event 201 and was focused on the coronavirus. The scenario was played out in which the virus spread into South America and would be blamed on animal to human transmission. They estimate 65 million deaths worldwide. Human freedom would almost certainly be dead. Event 201 was executed exactly how the outbreak is currently taking place. At this time, they are claiming that Wuhan, China is ground zero for the outbreak and that the eating of bats and snakes led to the coronavirus epidemic. But, coincidentally there are biohazard laboratories in Wuhan. It’s possible that the bug could have been miss-handled and gotten out of a lab or maybe it was purposely let out.
These people that belong to this Economic World Forum also belong to the infamous one percent. They are the same people that supported eugenics and world depopulation. This meeting was held in Davos, Switzerland. Currently, there are over 71,000 cases around the world with 99% of them being in China. The virus has claimed 1,776 lives. 11,147 people have recovered for the coronavirus infection. It’s said to have an 83% infection rate and a 17% fatality rate. Is this disease naturally occurring or is there something a lot more nefarious taking place right under our noses? Some feel that maybe President Trump hand something to do with this outbreak specifically to destabilize China. Social experimenting could be taking place just as well. The perfect test group would be people stranded on ocean liners under quarantine.
Can a killer bug just pop out of nowhere? Chemical and biological warfare has been used in military battles for centuries. A bug like the coronavirus could be of interest to many who may stand to benefit financially or militarily for its use as a biological weapon or to get a pharmaceutical drug on the market. Also, consider the fact that Bill Gates is all about population reduction and is part of a mock pandemic international exercise. Bill Gates comes from a line of eugenicists. This should raise a red flag but most people don’t truly understand Bill Gates’s agenda. He’s no humanitarian.
Not only is the information coming from China is being doctored but this whole thing may be manufactured, including the coronavirus itself. Did this outbreak start with people eating certain animals or is it due to scientific negligence? Maybe this is China being used as a testing site or was the virus created as a new form of bioweapon? These are some of the possible pieces of the puzzle. We have to put the pieces together.
I am not a conspiratorial theory-type. But if I was, I might suspect that former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg is Republican secret agent – a sort of Manchurian candidate – programmed to wreck the Democratic Party and get President Trump re-elected.
Of course, he is not. But he could not do more to ensure the defeat of the eventual Democrat candidate for President. – no matter who it is.
For generations, Democrats have promoted the belief that all those corporate fat cats were Republicans. That is why they complained about political donations from evil Wall Street. If there ever was the personification of what Democrats claimed to hate, it is Michael Bloomberg – a mega-billionaire willing to spend a fortune to buy his way into the White House.
While billionaire businessman Tom Steyer exposed a bit of Democrat hypocrisy as the Party leaders embraced both Steyer’s politics and money, Daddy Warbucks Bloomberg eliminates any pretense that Democrats are concerned about corporate money and those Wall Street one-percenters who control it.
They may be critical of him as a competitor, but not his money in principle. Senator Elizabeth Warren said Bloomberg should withdraw from the race but encouraged him to then use his billions to help Democrats get elected.
On the issue of money-in-politics, Bloomberg takes the onus off Republicans and makes the Democrats look bad.
However, that is small potatoes, as they say, compared to the damage Bloomberg is doing by running for President. While he claims to be most concerned that socialist Bernie Sanders might actually get the Democrat nomination for President, Bloomberg’s campaign is making that prospect more and more likely every day.
Bloomberg clearly further splinters the anti-Sanders vote. Entering the race was bad enough. But Bloomberg brought to the campaign more than enough money to guarantee a bloc of delegates – despite skipping the first four primaries.
Bloomberg’s initial strategy was based on arrogance and hubris. It was to put so much money in the race that folks like Biden, Buttigieg and Klobuchar would immediately suspend their campaigns and yield the road to Milwaukee to Bloomberg.
That is a simplistic theory, and there is no assurance that all the Biden, Buttigieg and Klobuchar voters would go for Bloomberg. It is arguable that a large percentage – even a majority of black and Hispanic voters in the so-called moderate camp — could switch to Sanders.
Since the moderates have not dropped out, Bloomberg has initiated Plan Two – to force a brokered convention in which he could more secretively buy the nomination. That, of course, would make the Democrat presidential nomination a jump ball between him and Sanders.
That is how Bloomberg will destroy any chance Democrats have of beating Trump. Imagine a nation facing the prospect of four more years of President Trump – by all measure a fairly successful President despite his abrasive and pugnacious personality – and either the radical socialist or the American oligarch as the other option.
If Sanders was the nominee, he has already said that Bloomberg’s money would be unwelcomed – and even Bloomberg seems to believe that no amount of money would overcome Sanders’ political vulnerabilities. He is probably correct.
If Sanders is kicked to the side at the convention and Bloomberg emerges as the Democrat standard bearer, no amount of money would get all those angry and bitter Sanders’ supporters to the polling places. They would more likely be in the streets protesting. It could be 1968 all over again.
One young Sanders supporters told me that if the Democrat establishment rigs the race against Sanders again, she and her friends will vote FOR Trump to punish the Democrat establishment. That may be just be anecdotal – just talk — but it does sound credible. And if she and her friends did that, there definitely would be others.
Bloomberg has the reputation as an intelligent man – but you have to wonder. Is he clueless of the damage he is doing to the Democrats – maybe even irreparable at this point – and the benefit his candidacy is providing to Trump? The only explanation that makes sense is the blindness of arrogance.
So, there ‘tis.
The drama concerning political consultant and Trump crony Roger Stone took another decisive turn on Thursday as U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson sentenced the 67 year old lobbyist to 3-years in prison, for allegedly lying and witness tampering.
The sentence was considerably less, then the recommended 7 to 9 years sought by federal prosecutors, who apparently had a personal vendetta against the flamboyant GOP political pundit.
Moreover, the trial itself was marred by a number of improprieties; the most telling concerned the jury selection allowed by Judge Jackson, in which an individual with an obvious political bias was cleared to sit on the jury to decide whether Stone was innocent or guilty of the charges.
Prior to sentencing, Fox’s senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano weighed in on the controversy surrounding the case, reminding viewers how Judge Jackson presided over the trial by refusing a second request by the defense team, after it was discovered that a key juror had lied on the questionnaire regarding any political predispositions or biases.
Napolitano concluded that “only a pardon can fairly undo this mess.”
Adding, “This is not about politics and it’s not about friendship, it’s about the Constitution and human decency.”
When asked what should happen on Thursday, Napolitano said, “The judge should interrogate this foreperson about her biases against the President.”
The 69 year old senior judicial analyst also concluded that “The judge should interrogate the departed prosecutors about what they knew about this foreperson and when they knew it and why they quit. And then determine whether or not the integrity of Stone’s trial was adversely affected by this juror. It seems inconceivable that it was not.”
Napolitano was referring to the highly unusual mass resignations by the 4-DOJ prosecutors, who apparently became angry at having their putative sentencing of 87 to 108 months rejected by Attorney General Barr.
The outrageous recommendation by the prosecutors sparked a brief dust-up between the President and the Attorney General, who complained during an interview that the President was making his job difficult.
As for Tomeka Hart, a former Memphis City Schools Board President who acknowledged her dislike for the President through a series of anti-Trump social media posts, to be awarded a position of foreperson on the jury that convicted Stone is outrageous.
Even more mind-bogging Hart actually posted on social media specifics about the Stone case, before she was selected to sit on the jury, breaking every tenet of confidentiality imaginable. Moreover, once it was discovered she violated a court ruling, a “mistrial” should have immediately followed, along with the Democratic activist being held in contempt
The question of whether the President will pardon Stone is almost a certainty, during a brief Q&A session with reporters the day before Stone was sentenced; the President was asked if he intended to pardon his long time friend.
The President responded, “I think it’s very tough what they did to Roger Stone, compared to what they do to other people on their side. I think it’s very tough. I think it’s a very tough situation that they did something like that.
Adding, “I’ve known Roger over the years. He’s a nice guy. A lot of people like him. And he got very – he got hit very hard, as did former White House National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and as did a lot of other people. They got hit very, very hard. And now they’re finding out it was all a big hoax. They’re finding out it was a horrible thing. It was – we were spied on – my campaign was spied on.”
Don’t be surprised that before Stone actually sets foot in a jail cell, he’ll be pardoned, to the chagrin of the rabid left.
The sky is falling again. The wolf is at the gate. The American Republic is about to crash. President Trump is the greatest threat to American democracy since King George III tried to take back the colonies in the War of 1812.
At least in the latest fearmonger campaign concocted by the Democrats and implemented by the public relations agency of CNN, MSNBC & Co. Several previous attempts to bring down President Trump — with variations on mendacious narratives that Vladimir Putin is Trump’s number one backer – have failed. And now we have yet another. This one due to a claim by one of the intelligence bureaucrats that the Russians are helping Trump – for a second time according to the left’s pernicious narrative.
Before dealing with the current re-packaging of the old propaganda, we should look back down that twisted trail to see how it all evolved.
American intelligence agencies discovered that Russian operatives were using social media to meddle in the 2016 General Election. This was reported to then-President Obama – whose initial response was to privately tell Vlad not to do that anymore. The finger shaking diplomacy was to no avail.
In retrospect, even Obama aides later admitted that a public condemnation tied to sanctions would have been more appropriate and more effective. Obama did impose some mild sanctions and booted the Ruskies out of some facilities in Maryland where covert operations were said to be taking place.
In those early days, it was widely reported by the intelligence community – and by President Obama – that the Russian meddling did not affect the outcome of the election. In fact, some of the meddling was harmful to Trump. Some was just to cause grassroots friction – especially in the area of race relations.
While the Trump campaign was peripheral to Russian meddling, Democrats and their media pals slowly twisted the narrative to suggest that Russian meddling was not only SOLELY to secure the election of Donald Trump, but that Trump, his family and his campaign aides were actively conspiring with the Russians.
Democrats and biased bureaucrats subjected the nation to a two-year investigation in which the assured we the people that Special Counsel Robert Mueller would most certainly find that Trump had conspired with the Russians. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff even reported that he had seen conclusive evidence. Schiff’s lie was exposed when Mueller have Trump a clear and complete exoneration of the accusations.
Having failed in that effort, the #NeverTrump Resistance Movement put the nation through a divisive impeachment process that was the most partisan in American history — and the first in which there was no underlying statutory crime.
House Speaker Pelosi broke tradition by putting Schiff and his intelligence committee in the fore of the impeachment investigation – a departure from the role of the Judiciary Committee to conduct any impeachments. Pelosi did not trust Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler to do a good job. He was the bull in the china shop compared to the slick talking Schiff.
As expected, the impeachment was foredoomed in the Senate. The ending of that movie was already known. And as some had predicted, the impeachment appears to have increased Trump’s favorability rating.
The twice debunked narrative of Trump conspiring with the Russians is now being resurrected once again – with all the hyperbole and sensationalism that only the left-wing media can provide. They hope to ride that dead horse to victory in the upcoming election.
The news of the day that has gotten the media cabal all excited is a report in the New York Times (where else?) that Trump replaced the head of national intelligence supposedly because a member of the intel staff reported to Schiff’s committee that the Russians were now meddling in the 2020 election to get Trump re-elected.
What facts to support that theory are yet unknown. But Trump’s enemies are declaring that he replaced his intel chief with the current ambassador to Germany because he was enraged that such a communication would be presented to Schiff’s committee without his knowledge. Trump expressed concern that Schiff would weaponize that information – true or not – to be used against the President – and that seems to be exactly what is happening.
It is not an unreasonable concern. Traditionally, the Intelligence Committee has stayed away from partisanship. That ended when Pelosi made the Intelligence Committee the most politically partisan legislative body within Congress. She did so by assigning the impeachment to Schiff and his band of rabid Democrats.
While Democrats say that it is part of the process for the intel community to brief Congress, someone seemed to skip the interim step – telling the President of the United States. Remember it was Obama who got the word first about Russian meddling -– before Congress. In fact, Congress was never informed until Obama went public with the information.
The President has every right to distrust Schiff and the Democrats on the Intelligence Committee. After all, they are the ones that undertook that unjustified impeachment. It was shamefully carried out for no other reason than to damage Trump’s reputation and historic record.
Why Trump’s intelligence officials would run off to Congress without informing the boss first is yet to be explained. But that alone seems to be more than just cause for a few heads to roll.
As to what the Russians might be doing, only time will tell. But a healthy measure of skepticism would be well advised before we follow Schiff & Co. down another rabbit hole – or perhaps more appropriately, a rat hole.
The Democrats are looking very desperate these days. Like all the other obsessive and irrational attempts to take Trump down, this could – and should — also backfire.
So. There ‘tis.
The widely anticipated first appearance of Michael Bloomberg in a democratic debate was far from the bombastic performance the former New York Mayor needed. Instead, he stumbled through most of the debate, which didn’t get lost on one person in the audience who was probably most keyed in to Bloomberg’s performance – Donald Trump.
The president, in an early morning tweet after the former mayor’s dismal performance, mocked Bloomberg, calling the former New York City mayor “grossly incompetent.”
“Mini Mike Bloomberg’s debate performance tonight was perhaps the worst in the history of debates, and there have been some really bad ones,” Trump tweeted.
“He was stumbling, bumbling and grossly incompetent. If this doesn’t knock him out of the race, nothing will. Not so easy to do what I did!” he added
“Worst debate performance in history!” he added in a subsequent tweet.
Trump’s remarks about “Mini-Mike,” were nothing new. At a rally in Phoenix Wednesday night, while the debate was taking place, the president had this to say, “Now they have a new member of the crew, mini Mike,” Trump told the crowd of supporters. “We call him ‘no boxes.’ I hear he’s getting pounded tonight,” Trump went on. “I hear they’re pounding him.”
But, the president was not alone in his assessment of Bloomberg’s poor showing. Pundits on the right and left feel that he struggled to find his footing during his debut at the Democratic primary debate in Las Vegas. It was the ninth primary debate so far, and his fellow candidates’ experience on the stage shone through.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) wasted no time going after Bloomberg after the debate began.
“Democrats are not going to win if we have a nominee who has a history of hiding his tax returns, of harassing women and of supporting racist policies like redlining and stop and frisk,” Warren said. “Democrats take a huge risk if we just substitute one arrogant billionaire for another.”
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) added later, “I don’t think you look at Donald Trump and say we need someone richer than Donald Trump in the White House.”