The friendly relationship between the United States and Germany has taken a turn for the worse. A new survey authorized by the Atlantik-Brücke and carried out by the polling firm Civey discovered that 85 percent of respondents assessed relations between the countries as poor to very poor.
According to a Der Spiegel editorial, US-German relations have plunged to perhaps an all-time low over deep political, social, and economic disagreements.
In the editorial, the author says that since Richard Grenell took over the reins as the American ambassador to Germany, both countries have been engaged in a kind of diplomatic ‘silent game’.
The article also quotes a statement made by the ex-president of the European Parliament and prominent SPD politician, Martin Schulz.
Schulz, when speaking of the US Ambassador, said: “Grenell is behaving not like a diplomat, but like a right-wing extremist colonial officer”.
According to Der Spiegel, Grenell’s behavior has led German officials to keep their distance. Apparently, Foreign Minister Heiko Maas prefers to keep encounters with the US ambassador as brief as possible, while Chancellor Merkel has never even spoken with him.
The editorial cites existing policy differences between Washington and Berlin on Iran, NATO defense spending, and unresolved trade disagreements.
US President Trump and US Ambassador Germany Richard Grenell have repeatedly and harshly criticized Germany’s unwillingness to comply with the NATO voluntary goal payment obligation of 2% of GDP.
In an interview with the German news agency DPA, Grenell went as far as to say that Germany abuses its friendship with the US.
“It is really insulting to expect that the US taxpayer pays for more than 50,000 Americans in Germany, but the Germans use their trade surplus for domestic purposes,” Grenell said.
The US has also considered moving some of its troops stationed in Germany to Poland.
Despite 85 percent of surveyed Germans having expressed their attitudes toward the US as negative or very negative, Berlin still hopes that the “good old days of the transatlantic partnership” will eventually return after Donald Trump’s presidency ends.
However, since current geopolitical trends seem to suggest that National Populism is here to stay, the Germans may be engaged in misplaced optimism and extreme naivety.
Two illegal immigrants from El Salvador living in the sanctuary jurisdiction of Montgomery County, Maryland, have been arrested and charged with the rape of an 11-year-old girl.
29-year-old Mauricio Barrera-Navidad and 28-year-old Carlos Palacios-Amaya, both illegal immigrants from El Salvador, were arrested by police in Montgomery County after the young female victim told a social worker about the rapes, WJLA 7 reports.
The victim who is now 12-years-old was just 11-years-old at the time of the alleged rapes. She told a social worker at her elementary school that in July of last year, she met Barrera-Navidad at a family birthday party. During the party, Barrera-Navidad took her into a bedroom and raped her. Following the alleged rape, the victim said that Barrera-Navidad continued to make contact with her against her wishes.
The victim told the social worker that she met Palacios-Amaya in September of 2018. Shortly after, she said that he raped her on several occasions. One time, the victim said that the Palacios-Amaya took a video of the rape on his cell phone. She also said that he would often try to coerce her into skipping school so she would be left at her home defenseless without any parents.
According to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency, Barrera-Navidad had been issued deportation orders back in December of 2016 but had continued to live in the sanctuary jurisdiction of Montgomery County, which actively prevents ICE from doing their job.
ICE officials have said that Palacios-Amaya had already been deported from the country once before in 2014. Sometime after he was deported, the violent illegal immigrant was able to slip back into the country and slithered his way to Montgomery County where he was shielded from another deportation.
Barrera-Navidad has been charged with one count of rape while Palacios-Amaya has been charged with four counts of rape.
Seventeen states and the District of Columbia have passed red flag anti-gun laws that allow a judge to sign a legal order allowing police to raid the property, with no prior knowledge or consent, of someone accused by someone else of being mentally unstable.
Forget due process. No crime has been committed. A family member with a grudge or a friend you owe money might sign a petition that questions your sanity and ability to handle a firearm responsibly. Perhaps it is a healthcare professional or law enforcement official who makes the anonymous accusation.
No matter – if a judge can be persuaded that the targeted individual sounds crazy enough to be a threat, the police will be authorized to conduct a raid and confiscate personal property with no formal charges or legal defense as required by U.S. law.
After 31 people were killed in recent mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, a bipartisan effort is using the public outrage, whipped up by the liberal press, into a feel-good call for action that grossly oversimplifies a very complex social issue.
Supporters of red flag laws believe that, since sociopathic mass shooters are mentally ill, taking guns away from people who own guns and are rumored to be psychologically unbalanced must be a good way to solve the problem. A mass murderer deprived of a firearm will pick up a knife, drive a car or shoot acid out of a squirt gun.
Now, Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) wrote legislation that announced federal support for states that voluntarily surrender their state’s rights and pass red flag laws. This is institutionalized bribery, of course, and shows no sign of slacking.
“My goal is to have a system that can identify truly a person about to blow, and do something about it before it’s too late,” said Graham, who also stated that mass shootings “involved individuals who showed signs of violent behavior that are either ignored or not followed up. State red flag laws will provide the tools for law enforcement to do something about many of these situations before it’s too late.”
President Trump is accelerating the gun grab by giving a thumbs-up to extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs) on August 5, 2019:
“We must make sure that those judged to pose a grave risk to public safety do not have access to firearms and that if they do, those firearms can be taken through rapid due process. That is why I have called for red flag laws, also known as extreme risk protection orders.”
The following states have already turned away from the 2nd Amendment and down the slippery slope of eroding due process in the U.S. The kind of person who is allowed to submit a red flag petition is also shown:
California: Family, household members, and law enforcement
Colorado: Family, household members, and law enforcement
Connecticut: One state attorney or any two police officers
Delaware: Family, household members, and law enforcement
District of Columbia: Family, household members, mental health professionals, and law enforcement
Florida: Law enforcement
Hawaii: Family, household members, teachers, medical professionals, coworkers, and law enforcement
Illinois: Family, household members, and law enforcement
Indiana: Law enforcement
Maryland: Family, household members, certain health professionals, and law enforcement
Massachusetts: Family, household members, and law enforcement
Nevada: Family, household members, and law enforcement
New Jersey: Family, household members, and law enforcement
New York: Family, household members, school administrators, and law enforcement
Oregon: Family, household members, and law enforcement
Rhode Island: Law enforcement
Vermont: State attorneys or the office of the state attorney general
Washington: Family, household members, and law enforcement
All states allow ex parte orders to confiscate a flagged person’s firearm without official notification. The identity of the accuser remains anonymous for the duration of the ex parte order, which can be executed quickly but holds for a short time. Most states require a court hearing to issue a final order to take away the weapon for a longer period of time. The flagged individual has the opportunity to contest the order at this hearing.
Colorado jumped on the red flag bandwagon in a big way on April 12, 2019, when Gov. Jared Polis signed HB 1177 into law, making the state #15 on the anti-gun-toting list. Talk about a good idea that could go horribly wrong:
“Under Colorado’s recent law, anyone at all can make a phone call to the police. They don’t even have to be living in the state. There is no hearing. All the judge has before him is the statement of concern.”
Weld County Sheriff Steve Rheams spoke for many when he said during a public radio interview:
“Just taking someone’s firearms away and leaving them in place doesn’t solve the problem in my mind. It could actually make it worse in some scenarios. And you know, we’re just, we’re kicking the can down the road to deal with the mental health issue.”
Rep. Meg Froelich (D-CO) said:
“We are a western state with a libertarian streak. We are a strong outdoors state with hunting and fishing. And so I think all of those make for a more nuanced discussion on this issue.”
Rather than being innocent until proven guilty, a person whose gun has been confiscated has the burden of proof to show that s/he is no longers a threat. This is the opposite of the way the American legal system is supposed to work. Yet, no one seems to care about that little legal detail.
Likewise, people pushing red flag laws assume it’s okay to violate the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Sheriff Rheams is a staunch supporter of the Constitution and said he’d go to jail rather than follow a court order to take away someone’s guns without due process:
“My oath of office, it reads that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution and laws of the state of Colorado. Obviously, that creates a concern if a law is adopted that I believe is in conflict with either the state Constitution or the United States Constitution.”
Counties across the nation calling themselves “Second Amendment sanctuaries” are defying the unconstitutional red flag laws.
Does the moon contribute to the insanity that seems to be plaguing humanity? Especially considering the mass shootings that have been going on currently. And if so, what is the purpose of the moon? Before one can ask these questions and others one must first understand exactly what a moon is.
When taking a closer look at our moon for an understanding of its nature scientifically it only makes sense to cross-reference all of the moons that are identified in our solar system. First of all, what is a moon? In layman’s terms, a moon is known to be a naturally forming sphere consisting of naturally forming material such as rock and metal. A moon is said to be a product of some form of space debris coming chiefly from larger objects colliding in space during the creation of the solar system. These spheres get trapped in the gravitational pull of larger celestial bodies or planets in a nutshell.
There are a lot of strange facts about our moon one of which being its size. It dwarfs all of the other planetary moons in our solar system. Also, the moon doesn’t rotate. We basically only see one side of the moon henceforth the phrase, Dark Side of the Moon. It has been associated with ominous lore such as Werewolves and Vampires. Also, the moon is connected to one’s mental health. Lunacy and lunatic stem from the root word lunar which is a term used to describe properties of the moon.
The Zulu priest Credo Mutwa has been given ancient knowledge from the sacred teachings of his Zulu ancestors. He was interviewed by David Icke at one point and the discussion was of the moon being a hollowed-out sphere. Credo stated that there was a race of beings called the Chitauri, an alien species, that came to earth flying in all types of vessels and airships jetting to and fro causing fear in the natives. The people were rounded up by the Chitauri using lightning bolt whips and told that they were great gods from the sky and from now on they would bring them gifts in exchange for their worship. These ships were bigger than mountains. One of the gifts the Chitauri people brought us was the moon per Credo Mutwa.
Barbara Marciniak claims to be a medium for Pleiadian extraterrestrials. In her book entitled Earth: Pleiadian Keys To the Living Library, she states that the moon is blocking decodable frequencies sent to humanity and delivering frequencies of control. Barbara says the moon is a very powerful electromagnetic super computer and has been beaming signals of energy to earth for eons. It is the proverbial eye in the sky.
For many, it would be incomprehensible for the moon, at 2,160 miles in diameter, to be an artificial construct that was dragged into earth’s orbit by reptilian extraterrestrials. Consider the implications this can have as it relates to Christianity and other world religions’. Hopefully, we are given or find the answers for which we seek.
A new poll has revealed that a two-thirds majority of Americans think that the United States government should not make cash reparation payments to the descendants of slaves.
According to the Gallup poll which was conducted in June and July, 67 percent of Americans opposed the idea of providing cash payments as a form of reparations to the descendants of slaves. The percentage of Americans who supported cash reparations stood at just 29 percent – up from 14 percent in 2002. The poll revealed that 73 percent of black Americans support cash reparations.
In June, the U.S. House Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties held a hearing on reparation where the considered HR Bill 4 – a piece of legislation which calls for the establishment of an expert committee that would study the idea of reparations and make suggestions to lawmakers.
The sponsor behind the proposed bill is Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, a Democrat from Texas. The legislation itself doesn’t propose how descendants of slaves would be compensated.
Democrats are starkly divided on the issue of reparations. While 49 percent of polled Democrats supported the idea of cash reparations, 47 percent opposed the idea. Democrats who support the idea is up nearly 100 percent from 2002, when just 25 percent supported it.
Independents, however, weren’t so keen on the idea, with 35 percent in support and 65 percent in opposition.
Among Republicans polled, just 5 percent were for reparations, up from 4 percent in 2002. Conversely, an astounding 92 percent of Republicans opposed the idea.
Lastly, the poll also revealed a bit of a racial divide on the issue. Among black Americans, 73 percent supported the idea, while just 16 percent of white voters supported it. Hispanics were more split down the middle, with 47 percent supporting the idea and 46 percent being against it.
With all the news about domestic shootings lately, potential conflict with Iran has been pushed out of the headlines. However, that does not mean that tensions between the US and the terrorist state do not continue to exist.. and mount.
While Iran is can puff out their chests and challenge the US in their rhetoric, they need to be aware what they would be up against should they face the world’s most powerful military and a Commander-in-Chief who is not afraid to use it.
The superior air power of the US could be particularly devastating to Iran, should war ever come between our two nations.
The B-2 Stealth Bomber could deliver a surprise punch to the Iran is that could mean their utter destruction
America’s Most Advance Weapon System
The B-2 Stealth Bomber is arguably the US’s most advanced and deadly weapon system. Originally developed in the 80s to take on an adversary much more powerful and dangerous than Iran – the then Soviet Union – it was originally conceived to infiltrate the Soviet air-defense network and attack targets with nuclear weapons.
In the decades since, its mission has grown to include conventional precision attack. The B-2 is the most advanced bomber in US service, and the only one of three types that still carries a nuclear payload.
The B-2 was developed as a black program. It was developed with such a high level of secrecy, that until it’s rollout in 1988 few were sure exactly what the B-2 looked like. And, since it was built and tested in and around the area of Groom Lake and Area 51, there are those that believed, (and still do!) that it was reverse-engineered from alien technology!
The B-2 is sixty-nine feet long and seventeen feet high. It has a wingspan of 172 feet. It has a speed of 680 miles an hour, and had a maximum altitude of 50,00 feet. It has an unrefueled range of 6,000 miles, and has midair refueling capability.
There is nothing in the Iranian Air Force that can match it.
The B-2 has two weapons bays built into the belly section that together can hold up to 60,000 pounds of ordnance. Each bay carries eight bomb racks, and in the nuclear role the bomber can carry an assortment of up to sixteen B61-7 bombs (10–360 kilotons), B61-11 bombs (400 kilotons) or B-83-1 thermonuclear bombs (1.2 megatons). The Spirit will also carry the new B-61-12 bomb with a “dial-a-yield” configuration, giving it a yield of .3, 1.5, 10 or 50 kilotons.
It can also be fit to carry nuclear cruise missiles, should the Commander-in-Chief authorize the use of such ordinance in a time of war.
Battle Proven Conventional Weaponry
While the B-2 has never yet been called upon to deliver the kind of nuclear devastation it is capable of, it has seen extensive use in the conventional role. The B-2 first dropped bombs in anger in the 1999 Kosovo War, followed by the Iran War in 2003. B-2s were among the first to drop bombs on the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan after 9/11, and bombed Libyan forces in 2011.
The bombers are restricted to flying from a handful of locations, due to their need for special climate-controlled accommodations to protect their radar-absorbent coatings. Flight time from the home of the Spirit fleet, Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, to Iran is thirty-eight hours and would require 4–5 aerial refuelings. Small numbers of B-2s can also operate from Andersen Air Force Base on the island of Guam in the Pacific and RAF Fairford in the UK.
B-2 bombers would almost certainly take part in any attack on Iran’s renewed nuclear program, which would almost certainly be a part of, or escalate to a larger war between Iran the US and our allies. The B-2 would likely be sent after the Iranian leadership itself, dropping Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs on hardened and underground Iraq’s command and control systems, ideally disrupting its ability to issue orders to launch missiles, and hopefully killing top military and/or government officials.
In a lengthy response to last week’s mass shootings which claimed the lives of 31 people in Ohio and Texas, Barack Hussein Obama laid out his case for who it is that we all should blame. The former President, who most Democratic presidential candidates would prefer not to have their name associated with, attributed the country’s violent culture on President Trump, ‘white supremacist websites’ and guns.
The former president, in a message shared to Twitter, called on U.S. lawmakers to enact more gun control measures to prevent more mass shootings, as if that would do anything at all.
In the statement, Obama wrote, “Until all of us stand up and insist on holding public officials accountable for changing our gun laws, these tragedies will keep happening.”
In a fashion no different than any other liberal politician, Obama laments that “no other nation on Earth” has the degree of violent gun crime as the U.S. does. Of course, he fails to take into account the other kinds of extreme violence other countries like the UK or Germany suffer from, but that’s beside the point I guess.
From his letter, the former president seems to think that we can just legislate this problem away.
Obama also called for increased censorship of so-called ‘what nationalist websites’ to help combat ‘radicalization’.
He writes, “There are indications that the El Paso shooting follows a dangerous trend: troubled individuals who embrace racist ideologies and see themselves obligated to act violently to preserve white supremacy.” Obama then goes onto draw false parallels between the radicalization of ISIS terrorists and the radicalization of white nationalists. “That means that both law enforcement agencies and internet platforms need to come up with better strategies to reduce the influence of these hate groups,” he adds.
Although Mr. Obama didn’t call out President Trump’s rhetoric by name, he urged Americans to “soundly reject language coming out of the mouths of any of our leaders that feeds a climate of fear and hatred or normalizes racist sentiments.”
Additionally, he condemned rhetoric designed to “demonize those who don’t look like us” or which suggests immigrants are a threat to America. He suggested that this kind of rhetoric has been the source of his worst events in human history.
“It has no place in our politics and our public life. And it’s time for the overwhelming majority of Americans of goodwill, of every race and faith and political party, to say as much — clearly and unequivocally,” he concluded.
Our government may actually be a cryptocracy vs. a democracy. Cryptocracy is a term that still has not made it into the standard dictionary. Don’t believe me? Just go and check dictionary.com. This word is shrouded in mystery but Stewart Swerdlow is a man who has experienced mind control at the highest level where even sex magic has been used to help condition certain minds for specific types of covert missions and activities. Stewart would define the cryptocracy simply as secret society.
Stewart Swerdlow’s great uncle was Yacov Sverdlov who happened to be the 1st president of the Soviet Union. Stewart’s grandfather was sent to the United Kingdom to start the communist party. He later was sent to the United States to start a communist party there as well. Stewart’s grandfather was a Soviet spy during WWII. Many people are unaware that the US and Russia of the Soviet Union were allies at this time. Swerdlow was born a clairvoyant with great mental gifts. He has experience alien abductions as well as government tampering, to say the least, through various forms of physical manipulations.
Stewart was part of the Montauk Project from 1970 to 1983 which involved time travel as well as forward viewing to other planets, etc. He has worked on many projects with the US government as well as some foreign governments. His knowledge of mind-control is unparalleled based on his first hand experience and involvement.
Stewart Swerdlow mentioned in an interview with George Noorey from Coast To Coast in 2016 that we are witnessing the Book of Revelations’ script being played out right in front of our eyes. This agenda is being pushed forward by the Illuminati/government, he said. Stewart stated that this cryptocracy is attempting to cause the end times via war, financial collapse, and drastic earth changes. He said this will lead into the staged alien invasion.
Stewart revealed that in the outer reaches of our solar system, “there is massing there a fleet of beings both from other parts of this universe as well as interdimensionally,” who are plotting to get rid of the Illuminati. This is exactly why the Illuminati have boosted their efforts to control the world and usher in a global government, the second coming of Christ and the acceptance of a new world religion.
These people, beings, entities feel that humanity would be doomed without mind-control. I feel that mind-control is prevalent in our world today. The oldest record of mind control was recorded by Marco Polo the great explorer back in 1298 while traveling through Asia. Here he encountered the Ashinshin group in Persia.
Everything from the food we eat to 5G technology has been put in place to totally manipulate, control and reprogram or pre-program society. To find out more about this topic I would suggest getting your hands on some of the books the Steward Swerdlow wrote so that you can travel your mind deeper into the rabbit hole. You’ve been warned!
Nigel Farage told readers of the Telegraph that the Conservative Party will be ‘annihilated’ at a general election in the case that Boris Johnson fails to deliver Brexit to the British people.
In his piece, Farage warns that Prime Minister Johnson could try to pass a version of Theresa May’s unpopular withdrawal treaty in the House of Commons. He also reminded readers that “Johnson twice voted against the Withdrawal Agreement but then fell at the final hurdle by voting for it at the third time of asking, back in March”.
Although the UK’s next General Election is scheduled for 2022, the Brexit Party leader said he would announce 150 candidates to run if Johnson fails to deliver Brexit by the October 31st deadline or seeks to pursue a soft exit like his predecessor did.
Farage’s Brexit Party is said to be making arrangements to run candidates in a general election in Labor heartlands in the north of England, the Midlands, and in Wales where about five million Labor voters backed Brexit.
“Having betrayed them, Labour certainly does not represent them any longer,” Farage wrote.
Even though Prime Minister Johnson has boosted no-deal preparations, he asserts that he can still negotiate a more favorable withdrawal agreement with the European Union.
Farage has lauded Johnson’s performance since taking office at Downing Street, but he has remained wary of the Prime Minister’s commitment to delivering a hard Brexit. He told readers of the Telegraph that they too should remain skeptical about Johnson’s ability to deliver a no-deal Brexit.
“Mr. Johnson did not intend to depart the EU by Halloween but was seeking to improve Britain’s negotiating position over the Withdrawal Agreement,” Farage wrote.
Farge then added: “It must not be forgotten that Johnson voted for it at the third time of asking. If passing this is now his ambition for Brexit, my party will vigorously oppose him.”
Hungary’s prime minister Viktor Orbán has warned his people and the people of Europe that the migrant crisis is far from over and that European nation-states need to be ready and willing to take action to rectify the globalist-led EU’s mistakes, failings, and years of recklessness.
As he spoke on the Good Morning Hungary show on Kossuth Rádió, Orbán observed that “There were many mistakes in the past five years, which Brussels let slip”. The Hungarian leader also mentioned that his Fidesz party – currently holding almost 60 percent of the seats in the Hungarian parliament – would not let up on its efforts despite its recent success at both the national and European levels.
During the interview, Orbán emphasized his strongly held belief that Europe can’t be strong unless it has strong nation-states – an indirect rejection of federalist tendencies of globalist bureaucrats in Brussels, which favors further the extreme centralization of power and increased integration between member states – the United States of Europe model, if you will.
The vast majority of people who are outside of the Brussels’ globalist establishment – meaning most Europeans – are opposed to this model.
Viktor Orbán, Matteo Salvini, and Marine Le Pen are all prominent voices who’ve been able to clearly articulate a clear alternative to this globalist-led United States of Europe model.
“While the right respects nationhood, the left pursues an internationalist agenda. Respect for our country, the representation of national interests, and fighting for our rights is a matter of obligation on the right,” Orbán said.
Orbán’s tone was more pessimistic when he was asked about migration.
“The pressure of migration will only grow further in the coming decades. The European population has been on the decline, while the opposite is the case in places like Asia or Africa. This situation will necessitate a much stronger border control system. Millions will arrive, and one of our most important tasks will be to defend our people,” he explained.
“European politicians want to legalize immigration, thinking that’s the right solution. We see it otherwise” Orbán continued, asserting that creating a social environment where families can flourish is a better way to stop Europe’s population decline than is the policy of replacement migration that leftists and centrists push.
“The question remains: how will we implement the allocated budgets? When will European parties realize that pro-migration has more disadvantages than benefits?”
“We will only be able to celebrate our success once the problem of terrorism, public security and migration have been resolved,” Orbán insisted.