An “unnamed Ukrainian official” has apparently shredded the “quid pro quo” claimed in the whistleblower account.
The compliant, which has caused a furor in Washington, has implied that President Trump froze nearly 5 million dollars in military aid to Ukraine, and did not release those funds until he got a pledge from the Ukrainian president to “look into” Joe Biden, and other matters of corruption.
However, Fox News is reporting that a Ukrainian official said that Kiev was not made aware that the U.S. had suspended those funds until a month after President Trump’s now infamous call with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky, which calls into question the whistleblower’s account and Democrats’ arguments that there was a quid pro quo for the aid.
The official told The New York Times that Zelensky’s government was unaware about the aid issue until a month after Trump’s July 25 phone call in which he discussed Joe Biden and his son Hunter.
The whistleblower complaint – citing U.S. officials – claimed that officials in Kiev knew that the military aid could be in jeopardy in early August, but the whistleblower admitted to not knowing “how or when they learned of it.”
Zelensky said earlier this week that he “never felt pressured” by Trump to investigate the Bidens. Trump insisted that he wanted to make sure the country was weeding out corruption before providing the funds.
Democrats insist that Trump was wrong to bring up a political opponent to a foreign leader, and that even if he didn’t explicitly make a demand, the innuendo was there. Democrats also took issue with the complaint’s claim that Trump employed his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani in the matter.
As allegations swirl surrounding the complaint, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has started an official inquiry into whether the House should pursue impeachment proceedings, but Democrats have refused to hold a roll call vote to authorize the effort.
“Impeaching a President means nullifying the results of a presidential election, which is the core act of American democratic legitimacy,” The Wall Street Journal’s editorial page wrote on Friday. “If Democrats are going to do this, they have an obligation to stand up and be counted in a way that the public can examine.”
Controversy over the complaint abounds. President Trump and fellow republicans point to the fact that the Whistleblower had no “firsthand” knowledge of the allegations he or she was making, and several other inconstancies in the complaint.
The New York Times has claimed to know that the whistleblower is a CIA official, and analyst, who had been assigned to the White House. There has been no corroboration of this claim.
A study carried out by the Institute of Legal Medicine in Münster has revealed that nearly half of the migrants who claim to be under the age of eighteen are adults.
On behalf of courts and youth welfare offices, legal physicians from Münster investigated the age of close to 600 so-called ‘unaccompanied minor refugees’ whose age had been in doubt.
What the researchers discovered was shocking.
Of the 600 ‘unaccompanied minor’ who were forensically examined by physicians, 40 percent of the young men were adults, Focus Online reports. Most of these men were from Afghanistan, Eritrea, Algeria, and Guinea.
But the 40 percent figure is more than likely a lowball estimate. If there was any doubt of a migrant’s age after the forensic analysis, the researchers classified them as a minor.
Forensic Science Professor and Deputy Director Andreas Schmeling told members of the press: “Since we cannot pinpoint the date of birth for the day, there is a gray area. With this variability, we always judged in favor of the person concerned. Thus in cases of doubt, he would be classified as a minor.
The ages of migrants were determined via data obtained from several different methods. Migrants underwent physical examinations, while their dentures, wrist bones, and clavicles were examined radiologically.
So-called ‘unaccompanied minor refugees’ receive special treatment in Germany. They receive more financial and social support, while they generally don’t have to live in collective accommodations.
The German Association of Towns and Municipalities has surmised that the cost to take care of ‘unaccompanied minors’ is approximately 5,000 euros per month.
Physicians in Germany aren’t the first in Europe to uncover the disturbing truth that large percentages of migrants lie about their age to receive special treatment.
In June, various media outlets in Europe reported that that 90 percent of Moroccan migrants who’ve come to Sweden in recent years under the guise of being ‘minors’ are adults.
Last year in Sweden, a dentist has his career ruined after he revealed to the public that 80 percent of the migrant ‘children’ patients that he was seeing in his practice were adults.
And, just weeks ago, newly released statistics in France revealed that French taxpayers are spending no less than two billion euros per year on so-called ‘underage migrants’.
Five radical Islamic terrorists who had previously been stripped of their Dutch identity will now receive their Dutch passports back due to a ruling made by the Raad van State (The Council of State).
In September 2017, July 2018, and April 2019, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs Mark Harbers withdrew the Dutch passports of men who were involved after it came to his attention that they had joined terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria, SCEPTR reports.
The withdrawal of their Dutch passports officially made the jihadists unwanted aliens of the Dutch state, which meant that the men could no longer legally step foot in the Netherlands, or by extension, Europe’s Schengen area.
But the decision to strip the radical Islamic terrorists was overturned by the Council of State, reportedly, due to a technicality. Reportedly, officials from The Council of State contend that because the terrorist organizations that the men had joined were not yet included on the list the country’s ‘prohibited groups’, the action that was taken by Mark Harbers was deemed illegitimate.
State Secretary for Justice and Security Ankie Broeker-Knol (VVD) has affirmed that the decision to undo the withdrawal of the men’s passports made for this reason.
In addition to having Dutch citizenship, the five radical Islamic terrorists also are citizens of Morocco. Their names are Driss Daouayry, Az Edinne Benaissa, Benyamine Fadlaoui, Mounir El Kharbachi, and Ridvan Öz.
Oddly enough, the decision to strip jihadists who travel abroad to fight for radical Islamic terrorist organizations is a hotly contested issue in many northwest European countries.
In March, Sweden’s left-wing globalist Prime Minister Stefan Löfven refused to strip Swedish Islamic State Fighters of their citizenships and has said that they have the right to come back to the country.
Denmark has been less lenient than its Scandinavian neighbor. Last spring, the Danish government decided that it wouldn’t recognize “ISIS children” as Danish nationals.
Our political system is nothing more than political theater. It is the big stage where the written script directs reality. The difference is on this stage the outcome is real. Wars are created, blood is shed and power is put in place. Our reality is being manipulated by the hands of those who hold the strings. Information is given on a need to know basis and those in power feel you don’t need to know much.
Our political system has been the subject of ridicule since it’s inception up until the present day. Ever since actors could become presidents even a blind man can see that the whole game is rigged. Many believe that Donald Trump never believed that he would win the presidency but what if Donald Trump was the last president of the United States of America?
There was a book written in 1900 called The Last American President written by Ingersol Lockwood. Ingersol was born in 1841 in Ossining, New York. Like his father, he also took up the profession of a lawyer as well as a writer and well known public speaker. In 1862 Ingersol was appointed a council to the Kingdom of Hanover by Abraham Lincoln. In fact, in 1896 he wrote another book titled Baron Trumps Marvelous Underground Journey.
The story begins in Russia where the young Baron Trump learned how to travel through time. It was here where Baron received instructions from The Don, Master Of All Masters. In this book, Baron Trump travels to Russia looking for a portal to a new world. Hollow Earth. Ingersol’s books were way ahead of the time. The strange part is that this Baron Trump lives in a castle in the novel that was named effectively Trump Castle. Strangely he closely resembles the young Barron Trump of our present time.
In this book The Last President, Trump actually becomes president of the United States. The book begins with Trump winning the presidency. In the book, Trump is looked at as impassable by most people but he wins the election anyway. This is eerily similar to our current president’s situation. Many people felt that Donald Trump was only running for the exposure and to boost his brand. Boy did he boost it! In The Last President, the book predicts that socialists and anarchists will riot and start an uprising in the streets of New York City and that Donald Trump would be our last president. In the book, Trump was actually encouraging an uprising. Basically Ingersol wrote of how Commies were taking over the country and there was social unrest throughout while the rich stay locked away growing old in their homes. The mob takes over Chicago and people were assassinated. The people felt that the newly elected president had ties with the money lenders and usurers.
President Trump’s hotel in this book is on 5th Avenue. The same address as Trump Towers in our present time. Another very peculiar fact is that in the book president Trump’s secretary of agriculture is named Laffe Pence. Our current vice president’s name just happens to be Pence. One has to wonder are these merely coincidences or are they apart of some sort of synchronicity beyond our basic comprehension? How could Ingersol foresee such events? Was he channeling information from a higher power as a medium, maybe he actually came in contact with Barron Trump traveling to the past, or is it likely that Ingersol traveled through time himself to see the future?
116 years in the future and Donald Trump is our current president. Remember Back to the Future II with Michael J. Fox? The character Biff stole McFly’s sports almanac that he got from traveling into the future. He made some sports bets, etc. and got filthy rich. In the movie, Biff had a weird yellowish-orange hair-do. He strangely resembles the 45th president. Not to mention the filthy rich factor. Is this also a coincidence?
The rumor is that Donald Trump, our current president, has the manuscripts of Nikola Tesla which were given to him by his uncle John Trump. Ingersol Lockwood was deep into hermeticism and the occult sciences. He also was the author of Laconis of Cult which expressed his vast understanding of the occult as well as esoteric knowledge. On March 13, 1895, Tesla was seen in a cafe by a reporter shaken to his core. He said he almost lost his life doing an experiment where he was hit with an electromagnetic ray of sorts. He was able to see the past present and future all simultaneously. Tesla died in 1943 in his hotel room where his property was seized by the Office of Alien Property. The expert they had come to review the documents and notes of Tesla’s confiscated paperwork was none other than engineer John G. Trump. Donald Trump’s uncle.
John Trump steals the documents concerning time travel and effectively lied to his superiors. The notes John took detailed the makings of a time machine. He studied the notes and eventually built one. In this time machine, he sees the apocalypse caused by Tesla’s Death Ray. John felt that he had to do something to prevent the creation of this Death Ray.
Unable to use the machine to go back to Tesla’s time himself to prevent Tesla from creating his Death Ray due to the need to have someone operate it, John decides to send Donald Trump back in time. John Trump modified the machine and sent Donald to 1890’s New York where he met Ingersol Lockwood. There he learned that he would be the president of the United States and would have a son but was unable to intercept Tesla.
Donald comes back with the knowledge of the apocalypse and the prophecy of his presidency. He has a son and named him Barron and sets his sites on the white house. As predicted, he won.
Is Donald Trump our last president? Are all of the similarities I mentioned facts, mere coincidences or a matter of the occult. I would advise researching the books The Last President, Baron Trump’s Marvelous Underground Journey and Laconis of Cult if possible so that you can get a better understanding. Be free.
President reached into my neck of the woods to nominate another great judge for a lifetime appointment to the United States Federal District Court for southern Florida. In fact, he plucked his choice from the overwhelmingly liberal Democratic Broward County.
The nomination of Anuraag “Raag” Singhal – who currently serves as a Circuit Court judge – has previously served as an assistant state attorney and a criminal defense lawyer. He had previously served as president of the Broward Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (BACDL). Singhal is a first generation American. His parents migrated to the United States from India.
In view of the bogus racist narratives being flung at Trump, the appointment of a minority is likely to conflict the politically correct Democrats in dealing with this nomination. Even so, the hardcore left will do everything they can to destroy the reputation of Singhal. It will not be easy.
Singhal has earned a primo reputation within the legal community – including from Democrats. That is significant since the judge is considered politically and judicially conservative. For conservatives, Singhal is a diamond among political cinders.
Singhal has been a member of the Federalist Society – an organization that vets and recommends highly qualified conservative judges for high court appointments. He is also a member of another conservative legal professional organization, the Thomas More Society.
This has not stopped the local legal establishment – mostly Democrats – from heaping high praise in Singhal. The man who succeeded him as president of BACDL, Democrat State Representative says Singhal is “a “lawyer’s lawyer” who represented his clients with “intensity and integrity … no theatrics, just true grit.”
The former mayor of Ft. Lauderdale, Jack Seiler, referred to Singhal a “a very thoughtful, intellectual judge. He treats everybody with respect, whether you’re a lawyer, a juror, a party, a witness,” – adding that “Integrity again comes to mind when thinking of his career as a judge.”
Singhal has handled several very controversial cases. He ruled that deposed Election Supervisor Brenda Snipes had broken the law when she prematurely destroyed thousands of ballots during a challenge. He was assigned to handle the risk assessment of those who were subjected to the new Red Flag law enabling law enforcement to seize weapons from those believed to be potentially dangerous. The law was enacted after the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida.
As a District judge, Singhal will not make determinations of constitutionality. He will basically deal with matters of fact in civil and criminal cases. But this is a guy who could easily rise to the Appellate and even the Supreme Court. We should keep an eye on Singhal when there is another vacancy on the highest court in the land.
So, there ‘tis.
Sweden’s grossly incompetent leftist-globalist government has allowed an ISIS fighter to return to the country to receive medical treatment from the Swedish state for an injury he received in Syria. If that wasn’t bad enough, they then allowed him to return to Syria to continue fighting for the ISIS terrorist organization.
Khaled Shahadeh, a former resident of Gothenburg and ISIS terrorist, has reportedly bragged about receiving medical treatment from the Swedish state after he was badly wounded in a clash with the Syrian military in 2014.
From a prison inside of Kurdish-held territory, 29-year-old Shahadeh told a crew from the Kurdish media outfit ReProduction, “They fixed the nerves. I recovered. Got married and returned here with my wife,” Expressen reports.
During the interview, Shahadeh goes on to say that when he returned “home”, he was greeted at the airport by staff from the Swedish Security Police SÄPO.
“They were a little worried about why I returned to Sweden,” Shahadeh continued
“They immediately started asking questions about why I returned and what I would do in Sweden. They made it clear from the start that I had not done anything that violated the law. They said there was no law that says I should not join al-Dawla or do jihad,” Sahadeh claimed.
In 2015, Shahadeh returned to the Islamic State in Syria. He’s admitted to witnessing mass executions of prisoners.
“Some prisoners were executed, others had their heads cut off. It’s the worst thing I’ve ever seen with my own eyes,” he said.
Shahadeh remained fighting alongside ISIS terrorists until the final battle in Baghouz during the spring of 2019 when he fled and ended up in the hands of the Kurds.
Once again, he’s banking on the sheer stupidity of the Swedish state to allow him back in.
“I want to ask for all the people forgiveness, not just my family. If Sweden wants to help us, let them help do it. We are grateful if Sweden helps us out of here,” Shahadeh concluded.
Sweden has the highest percentage of jihadists per capita in Europe who’ve traveled to the Middle East to join terrorist organizations
As Attorney General William Barr reviews the first draft of IG Horowitz’s report on possible FISA violations, two top Republicans have dropped hints that Democrats are likely to be devastated when the results are made public.
Both Sen. Lindsey Graham and Rep. Devin Nunes discussed the investigation into how the FBI obtained warrants used to electronically surveil onetime Trump campaign adviser Carter Page in back-to-back interviews on Fox News’ Sunday Morning Futures.
Graham, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, told anchor Maria Bartiromo when he expects to receive the report. “I think it probably will be around October,” the South Carolina Republican said.
It was the clearest indication yet as to when the public may get a first glimpse of the report. Republicans have expressed high expectations for former Justice Department and FBI officials to be held accountable for possible misconduct ever since Horowitz informed Congress on Sept. 13 that his team is in the “process of finalizing our report by providing a draft of our factual findings to the Department and FBI for classification determination and marking.”
Graham went on to say that, his “No. 1 goal” is to have as much of the report declassified as possible. Graham has said previously that he expects that IG Horowitz’s report will indicate that top Justice Department and FBI officials misled the FISA Court by using an unverified dossier compiled by British ex-spy Christopher Steele to obtain warrants to spy on Page.
At the tail end of their FISA discussion, Bartiromo said people she has spoken to suggest the CIA might be the “architect of this.” Before she could even finish, Graham cut in to say, “Stay tuned.”
Was that a hint that he knows something that we do not? Has he had an advance glimpse at the report?
I guess we indeed need to “stay tuned.”
What We Do Know Ahead of the Report
What we know for sure is that Barr has received the draft report from Horowitz and that he is in the process of reviewing it for redactions of classified and privileged information.
According to a letter sent to Congress earlier this month, the inspector general said his team has “reviewed over one million records and conducted over 100 interviews, including several of witnesses who only recently agreed to be interviewed.”
Horowitz and his team were tasked by Barr to “Investigate the Investigators,” and the IG has specifically been looking into how the infamous anti-Trump dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele was used to secure the original Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant for former Trump aide Carter Page, which launched the so-called “Russia Probe” in October 2016.
Horowitz’s team has questioned why the FBI considered Steele a credible source, and why the bureau seemed to use news reports to bolster Steele’s credibility.
Horowitz has indicated that once the Justice Department and the FBI send back a marked document relating to classified material, his team will “proceed with our usual process for preparing the final draft public and classified reports, and ensuring that appropriate reviews occur for accuracy and comment purposes.”
There are gaffes and then there are career ending gaffes. Even the normally left-friendly Washington Post, has been forced to admit that, former Vice President Joe Biden’s “record player” remark during the most recent Democratic Presidential Debate, was one of the latter.
Writing in the WashPo, columnist Hugh Hewitt says that Biden will likly never live down the record player kafuffle, and I agree. Hewitt says, “This was more than a gaffe that causes eye rolls. It was one of those gaffes that underscores a candidate’s central weakness and continues to bleed away votes long after its utterance.” Yep.
To remind you of what Hewitt is talking about, let’s look at the incident verbatim. Debate moderator Linsey Davis asked the 76 year-old former Veep, “In a conversation about how to deal with segregation in schools back in 1975, you told a reporter, ‘I don’t feel responsible for the sins of my father and grandfather. I feel responsible for what the situation is today, for the sins of my own generation, and I’ll be damned if I feel responsible to pay for what happened 300 years ago.’”
“You said that some 40 years ago,” Davis continued. “But as you stand here tonight, what responsibility do you think that Americans need to take to repair the legacy of slavery in our country?”
Biden replied, “Well, they have to deal with the — look, there’s institutional segregation in this country. From the time I got involved, I started dealing with that. Redlining banks, making sure we are in a position where — look, you talk about education. I propose that what we take is those very poor schools, the Title I schools, triple the amount of money we spend from $15 to $45 billion a year. Give every single teacher a raise, the equal raise to getting out — the $60,000 level.”
Biden’s seeming non-sequitur rant went on, “Number two, make sure that we bring in to help the teachers deal with the problems that come from home. The problems that come from home, we have one school psychologist for every 1,500 kids in America today. It’s crazy. The teachers are — I’m married to a teacher, my deceased wife is a teacher. They have every problem coming to them. Make sure that every single child does, in fact, have 3-, 4- and 5-year-olds go to school. School. Not day care. School. We bring social workers in to homes and parents to help them deal with how to raise their children.”
And then this happened, Biden continued, “It’s not that they don’t want to help. They don’t — they don’t know quite what to do. Play the radio, make sure the television — excuse me, make sure you have the record player on at night, the — the — make sure that kids hear words. A kid coming from a very poor school — a very poor background will hear 4 million words fewer spoken by the time they get there.”
So the moderator asked about America’s original sin — slavery — and Biden somehow got to “turning on record players,” which, says Hewitt, “wasn’t an effort to coax the hipster vote away from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) no matter how much the millennials love vinyl.”
Rather, Biden’s response was an incoherent, rambling, illustration of Biden’s key weakness — his age. Former housing and urban development secretary Julián Castro, during the debate, and Sen. Cory Booker, afterward, made this argument, first indirectly, then directly, but they didn’t need to. With this single response, which is going to stick to him like flypaper, Biden indicted himself on the age question.
Desperate to press any advantage they can find to maintain control of the House, and limit the Republican majority in the Senate, the Democrats have launched a futile bid for statehood for Washington D.C.
The Democrats that are behind the efforts say it is because “the people of the District of Columbia” lake representation in Congress. However, their motivation for statehood for D.C. couldn’t be more obvious. If it were to become the 51st state — Democrats would likely gain two new senators and one House representative — a reality which has played into the political motivations behind supporting or opposing the idea.
However, political agendas aside, Republicans oppose the measure because of concerns about reports of corruption and the scandals involving local officials that have rocked the District in recent months.
For example — Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, the top Republican on the House Oversight and Reform Committee, said he wanted the hearing on the matter to delve into the ongoing scandal involving D.C. Councilman Jack Evans.
Evans resigned from his role as the chairman of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority board this summer after an internal investigation determined that he failed to disclose a profitable conflict of interest.
“Sadly the allegations against Mr. Evans are just the latest in a series of local D.C. political scandals,” Jordan said, ticking off several former D.C. city officials embroiled in past scandals. “We cannot and should not ignore these unpleasant facts.”
However, Jordan said that Committee Democrats denied his request.
Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, the sponsor of the D.C. statehood bill and the district’s non-voting House representative, pushed back against the argument.
“The allegations against Mr. Evans have nothing to do with D.C. statehood,” she said.
Not a Single Republican Supports Statehood for D.C.
The D.C. statehood bill has more than 200 co-sponsors and the support of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, both Democrats. No Republicans in Congress have signed on to the legislation.
The bill calls for districtwide elections of two senators and one House representative. It says all district territory would be included in the declaration, save for specific exclusions of federal buildings and monuments, such as the White House and the Capitol.
Democrats argued that statehood is needed because D.C. residents lack adequate representation in Congress.
“D.C. residents have all of the responsibilities of citizenship but they have no congressional voting rights and only limited self-government,” the Democratic committee chairman Rep. Elijah Cummings, of Maryland, said in a prepared statement, which was read by Holmes Norton at the hearing.
But, in opposition, the Republicans said that the framers of the Constitution intended for the nation’s capital to be a federal district.
“This is not what the Founding Fathers intended,” Jordan said. “They understood and they carefully crafted the Constitution so that the seat of the federal government would purposely and specifically not be within a state.”
Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, has vowed to oppose the statehood bill.
Speaking to Fox News’ Laura Ingraham this past summer, McConnell said Democrats want D.C. statehood so they can get “two new Democratic senators” and said “as long as I’m the majority leader of the Senate, none of that stuff is going anywhere.”
I am old enough to remember the very first season of Saturday Night the Live. The original “Not Ready for Prime Time Players,” led by the likes of Chevy Chase and Gilda Radner, lived up to their name. The show was smart, edgy, and pushed the envelope of the NBC Censors to their limits, and often performed bits that would never, ever fly in today’s climate of “political correctness.”
I can say that with confidence, because newcomer to SNL, comedian Shane Gillis has been fired from one of the most coveted gigs in comedy for making “ethnic jokes” about Asians and gays on a podcast unrelated to SNL, that aired long before he started working on the show.
Gillis’s may be the shortest-lived gig for an SNL player. His departure comes just four days after the producers of SNL announced that Gillis was joining the cast for the show’s new season, set to start Sept. 28. “After talking with Shane Gillis, we have decided that he will not be joining SNL,” a show spokesperson said on behalf of producer Lorne Michaels, in a statement.
“We want SNL to have a variety of voices and points of view within the show, and we hired Shane on the strength of his talent as comedian and his impressive audition for SNL. We were not aware of his prior remarks that have surfaced over the past few days. The language he used is offensive, hurtful and unacceptable. We are sorry that we did not see these clips earlier, and that our vetting process was not up to our standard.”
Gillis was fired despite issuing an apology last week.
“I’m a comedian who pushed boundaries. I sometimes miss,” Gillis said. “If you go through my 10 years of comedy, most of it bad, you’re going to find a lot of bad misses. I’m happy to apologize to anyone who’s actually offended by anything I’ve said. My intention is never to hurt anyone, but I am trying to be the best comedian I can be and sometimes that requires risks.”
The PC backlash against Gillis began almost immediately after Saturday Night Live announced that he was joining the cast. A video clip from Gillis’ Matt and Shane’s Secret Podcast resurfaced in which the comedian is heard talking about New York’s Chinatown.
“Let the fucking ch-nks live there,” Gillis said, adding that a restaurant was “full of fucking Chinee [sic] in there.”
The podcast series also featured Gillis using the words “retard” and “faggot.”
It didn’t matter to anyone that Gillis was playing a character that was supposed to be a bigoted, insensitive, asshole.
Despite numerous calls for him to be fired, Gillis found one surprising defender — Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang.
“For the record, I don’t think he should lose his job,” Yang tweeted. “We would benefit from being more forgiving than punitive. We are all human.”
People need to lighten up and stop being so sensitive. It seems to me, that in the days some 20, 30, 40 years ago, when we all laughed not only at each other, but with each other, to the likes of the original cast of SNL, and Don Rickles, Jackie Mason, Richard Pryor, Buddy Hackett and of course Archie Bunker… we all got along a lot better then, than we do now!