Why the Media and the Dems are Hiding and Protecting the “Whistleblower”

It’s no secret that President Trump has accused the “fake news media” of shielding the whistleblower’s identity. In a recent tweet, the president said the whistleblower “got it so wrong” and added that he must come forward. The president has claimed that the media outlets know the identity of the whistleblower, but refuse to reveal him because there would be “hell to pay” from the Democrat Party.

It seems that not only may the president be right – that the lame-stream media knows the whistleblower’s identity – but we may now know why they are protecting him and that info.

Reports have surfaced that say that the whistleblower is likely Eric Ciaramella. Ciaramella, an ex-CIA operative, has ties to major Democrats and anti-Trump members of the intelligence community that are as thick as an elephant’s trunk!

It’s no wonder “Shifty Schiff,” the Dems and the media are so adamant about his identity remaining hidden. This wasn’t just standard whistleblower protection. This was narrative protection first and foremost.

If the whistleblower is indeed Ciaramella, the president was absolutely right in his speculation that “I don’t know if that’s true or not, but what they said is he’s an Obama person,” stated President Trump, “and that he was like a big, big anti-Trump person — they said terrible things.”

Here are some things you need to know about Eric Ciaramella. He was fired from National Security Council for leaking sensitive information from the White House. If that kind of information got out about the “whistleblower” that alone would have left people kind of skeptical. But, what if they also learned he worked for Joe Biden and traveled with him to Ukraine? Ciaramella did both of those things. Could this have been his real motive for filing the complaint?

Ciaramella is known to have direct ties to current Schiff staffers who worked with him for a time at the NSC and to associate with people like Susan Rice, James Clapper, and John Brennan. But it gets worse. It turns out his connections to taking down President Trump date back to before the 2016 election. He worked with Alexandra Chalupa, who Glenn Beck exposed as directly contributing to the Russian-collusion hoax, among other things.

The bottom line is, if the whistleblower is indeed, Eric Ciaramella, he’s a manufactured stool pigeon who may be the only person in Washington DC with less credibility than Adam Schiff.

Related posts

18 Thoughts to “Why the Media and the Dems are Hiding and Protecting the “Whistleblower””

  1. Cliff

    A so-called “whistleblowers” identity can only be protected UNLESS he has FABRICATED “evidence” or intentionally made a FALSE statement , which has been proven he HAS.
    SO his identity MUST be provided to the American People, and HE, held accountable for his lies and slander.

  2. Ralph

    We as citizens have the right to know our accuser , by law , therefore show you’re self or drop any charges against the person to whom the accuser is speculating about in this case the president of the USA.

    Show you’re self .

  3. If the LEAKER was A REAL, HONEST AND TRUTHFUL HUMAN, he would not have to hide behind the Evil, Criminal Corrupt, #1 Worlds LIAR, SCHIFF, unless, LIAR SCHIFF, COACHED AND WROTE THE LEAKERS STATEMENT… LIAR SCHIFF, COULD HAVE POSSIBLY FILLED THE LEAKER POCKETS WITH CASH OR PROMISES.

  4. kim

    “Shifty Schiff,” filled out the complaint for this Obama, kiss ass, Eric Ciaramella and I hate to tell you all bit the whistle-blower law is only for harassment at the work place not his identity. Now lets see Eric go under oath and swear that he did not meet with Shifty Schiff and his co-horts ?? We all ready know who made out the complaint right Shifty ?? and for the record Schift will be brought before the senate to testfy under oath that he did not have anything to do with the complaint this is why the dems do not want Eric’s name released and all of sudden his complaint is no longer needed by Shifty…. This smells like another set up against our president ….

  5. Unicorn76

    Republicans can also connect dots!

  6. We don’t know his idenity, what happened to the accused confronting his/her accuser!

  7. the dems will probably murder him in a few weeks – just like hill & bill did with epstein

  8. Wanda

    He must be revealed and arrested.

  9. Because it a demon just like them not a lick of proof Just a lair and crooked anything to try and overthrow our Government!! Schiff and the rest of the demons Obmama and the clintons!!!

  10. LOCK up these FAKE whistleblowers for Collusion, SEDITION, perjury and TREASON . . . ASAP! (OH, and don’t forget locking up SCHIFF and Pelosi for SEDITION as well!). Team Trump and his allies 2020 – KAGA (Keep America Great Again).

  11. samurai_larry

    First of all, this “whistleblower” is accusing a sitting President of wrong doing – why the anonymity. He should have been “outed” immediately. The whole thing is a joke, it is strictly a power play by the Dems and the Republicans better pay attention or they will lose (as will America). Trump is not the only target here, the whole Republican party is under attack – they just don’t know it yet!. Letting the Dems keep the “whistleblower’s” identity a secret, allowing Dems to have secret impeach inquiry meetings, allowing Schiff to “coach” his witnesses, come on – this needs to stop. The whistleblower needs to be outed and the whole impeachment inquiry hoax needs to be exposed as a Democratic power play/coup.

  12. It doesn’t matter if the whistleblower is an anti-Trump operative. What does it matter? NONE! He still deserves protection. It’s the law! The whistleblower wrote a report on a totally criminal call by Trump. That report started the impeachment process, but the whistleblower didn’t. It was started by Pelosi, who is most definitely an anti-Trump operative. The whistleblower does not get blamed for any of this! NONE! In a trial, people get to meet their accuser, but only in a trial. This impeachment inquiry HASN’T reached the trial stage yet, so quit calling for the whistleblower’s identity. It has to be protected, by law! Besides, the House doesn’t need the whistleblower anymore because it has so much better evidence from Trump officials who have already testified that a quid quo pro was demanded by the president! He’s guilty, he’s a criminal. Read the Transcript!

  13. Dude

    Shitty Schiff has a twin brother……both majored in lying

  14. Back in the day, we used to have blanket parties for guys like Ciaramella. Or, we would shove their heads into a toilet and give them a swirlie. The worst thing ever done was beating them up and teaching them a lesson not to be a rat.

  15. There are very good reasons why a law was enacted to protect a whistleblower’s identity from harassment and violence. Like DEEP THROAT, this present day patriot is providing a most valuable service to our COUNTRY. Thank you so much SIR/MADAM FOR YOUR PATRIOTISM.

  16. I’ve seen enough articles about Eric Ciaramella to know that he’s been a part of every attempt the Democrats and the deep state have attempted to take Trump down. He supposedly went to the Ukraine with the Chalupa woman (who was a DNC member and a Hillary backer) to dig up dirt on Trump prior to the election in 2016. He was an active participant in getting the Trump/Russia collusion investigation started and now he’s the initiator of the Ukraine quid pro quo investigation. He was planted, as a spy, in the Trump White House (by Obama-he was a holdover from Obama-his gift to Trump). He was subsequently fired for leaking government secrets. He is best buds with Brennan, Rice and Clapper and, in all probability he got his second hand information from none other than Vindman (who is a Never Trumper who also testified negatively in the investigation).

  17. Robert

    now when the law says anyone exposing any whistleblower can be prosecuted, to the full extent of the law under the whistleblower act. That could be another law broken which, Trump thinks is rediculious.

  18. Joe Biden

    Call your first witness – Adam Schiff, second? Oh, not needed, not guilty!

Comments are closed.